Applying the DMAIC Approach to Reduce Pre-Analytical Errors: Evidence froma Moroccan Medical Laboratory Case Study

Authors

  • Mohamed Omari Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques of Casablanca, Morocco. Research laboratory: care, health and sustainable development (2s2d), team 3: health sciences, education and management (2sem).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v104i06.6258

Keywords:

DMAIC methodology, Lean Six Sigma, Pre-analytical errors, Process improvement, Medical laboratory

Abstract

Background: Pre-analytical errors are the most common mistakes in medical laboratories and can directly affect patient safety and the accuracy of test results. Typical problems include hemolysis, mislabeling, and issues with sample transport. In Morocco, few studies have looked closely at these errors or tested structured improvement approaches such as DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control).
Aim: This study aimed to see whether the DMAIC method could reduce pre-analytical errors in a private laboratory in Casablanca, and whether it could provide practical guidance for similar low-resource laboratories.
Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study with 324 patients—162 before (September 2023) and 162 after (February 2024) the intervention. Data came from the Laboratory Information System, internal audits, and incident reports. Key indicators included hemolysis, labeling
mistakes, and transport problems. We used Pearson’s Chi-square test to compare groups, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.
Results: The percentage of patients with at least one pre-analytical error dropped from 43.8% (71/162) to 17.9% (29/162) (χ² = 24.67; df = 1; p <0.001). Labeling mistakes fell from 29 to 8 cases, transport issues from 24 to 11, and hemolyzed samples from 12 to 3. The sigma level rose from
3.03 to 3.86, showing clear improvement in process reliability. The improvements remained stable over time.
Conclusion: Applying the DMAIC method significantly reduced pre-analytical errors and improved laboratory processes. This structured, step-by-step approach can help similar laboratories improve patient safety and test reliability, even with limited resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic AM. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochem Med. 2010;126-30. doi:10.11613/

BM.2010.014

Thakur V, Akerele OA, Randell E. Lean and Six Sigma as continuous quality improvement frameworks in the clinical diagnostic

laboratory. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. 2 janv 2023;60(1):63-81. doi:10.1080/10408363.2022.2106544

Patra SMD, Seth S, Laboratory Medicine, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Narayana, Superspeciality Hospital, Kakryal, Katra, Jammu and

Kashmir, 182320, India, Sah NK, Department of Biochemistry,Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Lado,

Kumarhatti - Solan 173229 India, Rajwal N, et al. Evaluation of pre-analytical errors using six sigmametrics towards quality of laboratory

performance in an Indian tertiary care hospital. Bioinformation. 31 oct 2024;20(10):1418-23. doi:10.6026/9732063002001418

Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. mars 2010;47(2):101-10. doi:10.1258/

acb.2009.009222

Teich ST, Faddoul FF. Lean management—the journey from Toyota to healthcare. Rambam Maimonides medical journal. 2013;4(2):2.

Ibrahim I, Sultan M, Yassine OG, Zaki A, Elamir H, Guirguis W. Using Lean Six Sigma to improve timeliness of clinical laboratory

test results in a university hospital in Egypt. IJLSS. 5 sept 2022;13(5):1159-83. doi:10.1108/IJLSS-08-2021-0138

Jain P, Chauhan P, Uppal V, Debnath E. Quantification of pre- analytical quality indicators in a clinical laboratory and formulating

the lean six sigma DMAIC strategy. Journal of the Indian Medical Association. 2022;66(2):15.

Nurhadi MI, Ridwanna S, Rinaldi SF, Nurhayati B. Evaluation of Quality Indicators with Lean Six Sigma In Pre and Post Analytical

Laboratories. MJMLT. 21 avr 2025;3(1):25-33. doi:10.52221/mjmlt. v3i1.795

George ML. Lean Six Sigma for service: how to use Lean Speed and Six Sigma Quality to improve services and transactions. New York:

McGraw-Hill; 2003. 386 p.

Poksinska B. The current state of Lean implementation in health care: literature review. Quality Management in Healthcare.

;19(4):4. doi:10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181fa07bb

Zajkowska EL. Contribution à l’implantation de la méthode Lean Six Sigma dans les Petites et Moyennes Entreprises pour l’amélioration des processus [Thése de doctorat] [Internet]. [France]: Université Lille Nord-de-France; 2012 [cité 1 déc 2022]. Disponible sur: https://theses.hal.science/tel-00795533/document

Shah SMM. The relationship between Leadership styles and Job Performance: The moderating role of performance appraisal

politics [Thése de doctorat]. [Malaysia]: Universiti Utara Malaysia; 2016.

Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a Stat Laboratory: Types and Frequencies 10 Years Later. Clinical Chemistry. 1 juill

;53(7):1338-42. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344

Sandhu PK, Bandyopadhyay K, Hunt W, Taylor TH, Birch RJ, Krolak J, et al. Effectiveness of Laboratory Practices to Reduce Specimen

Labeling Errors at the Time of Specimen Collection in Healthcare Settings: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) Systematic

Review. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine. 1 sept 2017;2(2):244-58. doi:10.1373/jalm.2017.023762

Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 1 janv 2011;49(7). doi:10.1515/CCLM.2011.600

Narayanan S, Guder WG. Preanalytical Variables and Their Influence on the Quality of Laboratory Results. The electronic Journal of

the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2025;13(2):4.

Letelier P, Guzmán N, Medina G, Calcumil L, Huencho P, Mora J, et al. Workflow optimization in a clinical laboratory using

Lean management principles in the pre-analytical phase. J Med Biochemistry. 2021;40(1):26-32. doi:10.5937/jomb0-26055

WHO. World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. 2020 [cité 19 janv 2025]. Disponible sur: https://www.who.int/fr

Delgado HRG, Bermúdez MGG, Murillo AJG, Martinez JDV, Jara CAV. Improvement Plan for the Pre-Analytical Process of the SEMEDICLAB Laboratory Period 2022. RGSA. 23 janv 2025;19(1):e010909. doi:10.24857/rgsa.v19n1-094

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-21

Issue

Section

Health in the maghreb

Categories