Redéfinir l’apprentissage à l’ère numérique : Des outils innovants au service de l’éducation médicale moderne
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v104i01.5670Mots-clés :
outils innovants, éducation médicale, apprentissage synchrone, apprentissage asynchroneRésumé
Le développement rapide des outils numériques pour l’enseignement et la formation médicale a élargi les possibilités d’apprentissage flexible et personnalisé, tout en posant des défis pour le choix des outils adaptés aux besoins spécifiques. Cet article propose un cadre fonctionnel pour aider les enseignants et les apprenants à sélectionner les outils en fonction de leurs besoins et du contexte d’apprentissage. En classant les outils en catégories synchrones et asynchrones, nous visons à simplifier le processus décisionnel et à optimiser les expériences éducatives.
Les outils synchrones tels que YouTube Live, PathCast, Zoom et Microsoft Teams favorisent la participation en temps réel et soutiennent la communication, la collaboration et la réactivité dans l’environnement d’apprentissage. Ils sont particulièrement utiles pour le streaming en direct, les séances de questions-réponses et les discussions, où les retours immédiats renforcent les résultats d’apprentissage.
Les outils asynchrones comme YouTube, Canvas, Elicit et Quizlet permettent aux apprenants d’étudier à leur propre rythme, favorisant l’autonomie et la mémorisation. Ces plateformes offrent la possibilité de mettre en pause, de revoir et de répéter les contenus, ce qui les rend idéales pour des cours complexes nécessitant une répétition efficace.
Les modèles hybrides, notamment l’approche de la classe inversée, intègrent efficacement ces deux modes. Des outils comme Edpuzzle et Nearpod permettent de créer des leçons interactives et des exercices en classe. L’intégration des technologies innovantes dans l’enseignement médical ne se limite pas à l’adoption de nouveaux outils, mais vise aussi à promouvoir l’adaptabilité et une culture d’apprentissage continu. Combiner outils synchrones et asynchrones avec une approche centrée sur l’humain permet de créer des environnements d’apprentissage flexibles et réactifs, où enseignants et apprenants peuvent faire des choix éclairés pour répondre à des besoins diversifiés.
Téléchargements
Références
Chai SS, Ting SH, Goh KL, Chang YHR, Wee BL, Novita D, et al. Beyond digital interfaces: The human element in online teaching and its influence on student experiences. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(7):e0307262.
Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ. 1999;318(7193):1280‑3.
Komasawa N, Yokohira M. Learner-Centered Experience-Based Medical Education in an AI-Driven Society: A Literature Review. Cureus [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Oct 29]; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/195518-learner-centered-experience-based-medical-education-in-an-ai-driven-society-a-literature-review
Sarkar M, Liu K, Kumar A, Ilic D, Morphet J, Maloney S, et al. Student and Educator Perspectives of Adapting to Remote Health Professions Education: A Mixed-Methods Study. Front Med. 2022;9:834228.
Tobin B, Farren M, Crotty Y. Impacting teaching and learning through collaborative reflective practice. Educ Action Res [Internet]. 2024 [cited2024 Oct 29]; Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09650792.2024.2394933
Densen P. Challenges and Opportunities Facing Medical Education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2011;122:48.
Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J.2021;8(2):e188.
Mhlanga D. Digital transformation of education, the limitations and prospects of introducing the fourth industrial revolution asynchronous online learning in emerging markets. Discov Educ. 2024;3(1):32.
Mao S, Guo L, Li P, Shen K, Jiang M, Liu Y. New era of medical education: asynchronous and synchronous online teaching during and after COVID-19. Adv Physiol Educ. 2023;47(2):272.
Chauhan V. Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning. Imp J Interdiscip Res [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Oct 29]; Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Synchronous-and-Asynchronous-Learning-Chauhan/48c279efde31e1b09dbc5368bddb7457fb9965e9
Zeng H, Luo J. Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: a meta-analysis. Interact Learn Environ. 2024;32(8):4297‑313.
Intan Nuyulis Naeni Puspitasari. Combination of Synchronous and Asynchronous Models in Online Learning. J Pendidik Islam Indones. 2021;5(2):198‑217.
Amiti F. SYNCHRONOUS AND ASYNCHRONOUS E-LEARNING. Eur J Open Educ E-Learn Stud [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Oct 29];5(2). Available from: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejoe/article/view/3313
Anwar MI, Naeem MT, Aamir Jameel M, Jameel H, Tahir S. A Cross-Sectional Study on the Impact of Synchronous Learning among Medical Students during Covid 19 Pandemic: A Case Study of SKZMC, Lahore. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(2):207‑9.
Potyazhenko MM, Sokolyuk NL, Lyulka NO, Kitura OE, Nastroga TV, Nevoit GV, et al. Problems of medical education and implementation of digital learning model in training future physicians in specialty "Internal Diseases" during COVID-19 pandemic and full-scale war in Ukraine. Aktual Probl Suchas Med Visn Ukr Med Stomatol Acad. 2022 Nov 29;22:194-8
Kohnke L, Moorhouse BL. Facilitating Synchronous Online Language Learning through Zoom. RELC J. 2022;53(1):296‑301.
Huey M. The Impact of Synchronous Zoom Learning on Course Comprehension and Psychological Well-Being in the College Classroom. J Sch Educ Psychol [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 2024];4(1). Available from: https://journalofschoolpsychology.com/index.php/josep/article/view/52
Idleman BJ. Cast a wider net: Leveraging Canvas for asynchronous information literacy learning. Coll Undergrad Libr. 2022;29(1‑2):78‑99.
Andresen MA. Asynchronous Discussion Forums: Success Factors, Outcomes, Assessments, and Limitations. J Educ Technol Soc [Internet]. 2009 [cited Oct 2024]; Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Asynchronous-Discussion-Forums%3A-Success-Factors%2C-Andresen/8d597d999d822456df418f9ec9c018af1ebc963f
Chavan S. Augmented Reality vs. Virtual Reality: Differences and Similarities. 2016 [cited2024 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Augmented-Reality-vs.-Virtual-Reality%3A-Differences-Chavan/7dda32ae482e926941c872990840d654f9e761ba
Hamilton D, McKechnie J, Edgerton E, Wilson C. Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. J Comput Educ. 2021;8(1):1‑32.
Nanda I, Monirujjaman Khan M, Saleh Md Fahim KA, Tauqir Rayhan M, Sattar Sohel I, Ahmed Rakin SS, et al. Teaching medical students about human anatomy using virtual reality: a novel approach. In: International Conference on Power Electronics & Sustainable Development (ICPESD) [Internet]. Volkson Press; 2022 [cited 2024 Oct 29]. p. 211-4. Available from: https://www.intelcomp-design.com/paper/3icpesd2022/211-214.pdf
Banerjee S, Pham T, Eastaway A, Auffermann WF, Quigley EP. The Use of Virtual Reality in Teaching Three-Dimensional Anatomy and Pathology on CT. J Digit Imaging. 2023;36(3):1279‑84.
Shoufan A, Mohamed F. YouTube and Education: A Scoping Review. IEEE Access. 2022;10:125576‑99.
Araújo Da Silva KK, Machado LR, Ribeiro Ribeiro AC, Da Silva JS, Behar PA. Reporting an experiment live-streaming classes in a distance learning course. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technologies 2020 [Internet]. IADIS Press; 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. p. 65-71. Available from: http://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/reporting-an-experiment-live-streaming-classes-in-a-distance-learning-course
Madrigal E, Mannan R. pathCast: An Interactive Medical Education Curriculum That Leverages Livestreaming on Facebook and YouTube. Acad Med. 2020;95(5):744‑50.
Zaidi SJA, Kazmi S, Shahid Shamim M. Ways of Engaging Students Through Zoom and Avoiding Zoom Fatigue. Pak J Public Health. 2022;11(4):211‑3.
Tan HCL, Tan JH, Sagap I. Use of contemporary live TELE‐VIDEO conferencing for continuing surgical training at the time of COVID ‐19 pandemic. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(7‑8):1526‑1526.
Hidayat S, Lovita ID, Zakiyah Z, Mimin M, Nurpratiwi A. The Effectiveness of Online Learning Using Zoom Meetings at Elementary Schools. Int J Technol Educ Sci. 2022;6(4):559‑68.
Liao SC, Chen W, Tai CJ. Enhancing medical ethics instruction with a classroom response system. Med Educ. 2009;43(5):487‑8.
Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS. Justifying the inclusion of audience response system for the delivery of medical education. Muller J Med Sci Res. 2021;12(1):39‑41.
Castillo S, Thomas L, Yarlagadda S, Ahmed Y, Newman JR. Poll Everywhere to Encourage Learner Satisfaction and Participation in Internal Medicine Fellowship Didactics. Cureus [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 7]; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/27872-poll-everywhere-to-encourage-learner-satisfaction-and-participation-in-internal-medicine-fellowship-didactics
Odeh H, Kaddumi EG, Salameh MA, Al-Khader A. Interactive Online Practical Histology Using the Poll Everywhere Audience Response System: An Experience During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Int J Morphol. 2022;40(1):102‑6.
Sikarwar AS. Flipped Classroom with Poll Everywhere: Engaging Students with Active Learning in Large Group Settings. J Asian Sci Res. 2015;5(2):111‑9.
Mustafa AG, Taha NR, Alshboul OA, Alsalem M, Malki MI. Using YouTube to Learn Anatomy: Perspectives of Jordanian Medical Students. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:1‑8.
Curran V, Simmons K, Matthews L, Fleet L, Gustafson DL, Fairbridge NA, et al. YouTube as an Educational Resource in Medical Education: a Scoping Review. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(4):1775‑82.
Jeong S, Hwang H. Do we need Moodle in medical education? A review of its impact and utility. Kosin Med J. 2023;38(3):159‑68.
Beck Dallaghan GL, Lomis K, Crow S, Coplit L. Bridging educational innovation and financial offices: using the Business Model Canvas modified for medical educators to communicate need. J Commun Healthc. 2022;15(2):131‑6.
Kung JY. Elicit. J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2023;44(1):15.
Aktay S. AI in academia: analysis of Elicit AI tool. 2024.
Montenegro-Rueda M, Fernández-Cerero J, Fernández-Batanero JM, López-Meneses E. Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers.2023;12(8):153.
Lo CK. What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Educ Sci. 2023;13(4):410.
Alkhaaldi SMI, Kassab CH, Dimassi Z, Alsoud LO, Fahim MA, Hageh CA, et al. Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9(1):e51302.
Kipp M. From GPT-3.5 to GPT-4.o: A Leap in AI’s Medical Exam Performance. Information. 2024;15(9):543.
Dengri C, Gill A, Chopra J, Dengri C, Koritala T, Khedr A, et al. A Review of the Quiz, as a New Dimension in Medical Education. Cureus [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 7]; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/71482-a-review-of-the-quiz-as-a-new-dimension-in-medical-education
Zeitlin BD, Sadhak ND. Attitudes of an international student cohort to the Quizlet study system employed in an advanced clinical health care review course. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28(4):3833‑57.
Mishall PL, Burton W, Risley M. Flashcards: The Preferred Online Game-Based Study Tool Self-Selected by Students to Review Medical Histology Image Content. In: Abdel Meguid E, Mishall PL, Nation HL, Rea PM, éditeurs. Biomedical Visualisation [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 7]. p. 209‑24. (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; vol. 1406). Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-26462-7_10
Yeh DD, Park YS. Improving Learning Efficiency of Factual Knowledge in Medical Education. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(5):882‑9.
Amini A, Damanik DR, Sihombing ZA, Rangkuti VSM, Rusli R. Pengembangan materi pembelajaran bahasa di sekolah dasar. Perspekt J Pendidik Dan Ilmu Bhs. 2023 Dec 27;2(1):61‑6.
Park JC, Kwon HJE, Chung CW. Innovative digital tools for new trends in teaching and assessment methods in medical and dental education. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:13.
Galvez R, Wallon RC, Shackelford L, Amos JR, Rowen JL. Use of Virtual Reality to Educate Undergraduate Medical Students on Cardiac Peripheral and Collateral Circulation. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(1):19‑22.
Bordes SJ, Walker D, Modica LJ, Buckland J, Sobering AK. Towards the optimal use of video recordings to support the flipped classroom in medical school basic sciences education. Med Educ Online. 2021;26(1):1841406.
Joshi MK. Novel teaching–learning and assessment tools to complement competency-based medical education in postgraduate training. Indian J Anaesth. 2024;68(1):11‑6.
Collins E, Ahmad A, May H, Price K, Egbase E, Mathews C. Transforming postgraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: creating a trainee-led virtual teaching platform. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(1):e7‑10.
Tindale RS, Winget JR. Learning While Deciding in Groups. In: Argote L, Levine JM, éditeurs. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2020 [cité 28 janv 2025]. p. 154‑74. Disponible sur: https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28140/chapter/212900297
Jones RB, Maramba I, Boulos MNK, Alexander T. Use of Live Interactive Webcasting for an International Postgraduate Module in eHealth: Case Study Evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e46.
Watters G. Continuing Professional Development. In: Loh E, Long PW, éditeurs. Textbook of Medical Administration and Leadership [Internet]. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023 [cité 23 janv 2025]. p. 31‑48. Disponible sur: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-99-5211-3_3
Jampani R, Nayanatara V. Review article on continuing medical education activities. Indian J Orthop Surg. 2020;6(3):154‑60.
Farid G, Rasul S, Jaleel ProfA, Zahid Bashir ProfM. Exploring the Impact of Chat GPT on Medical Education and Research: A Comprehensive Review (Preprint) [Internet]. Journal of Medical Internet Research; 2024 [cité 23 janv 2025]. Disponible sur: http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/56232
Hsu MH, Chen YH. Personalized Medical Terminology Learning Game: Guess the Term. Games Health J. 2024;13(2):84‑92.
Bishop J, Verleger M. The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. In: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings [Internet]. Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE Conferences; 2013 [cité 7 nov 2024]. p. 23.1200.1-23.1200.18. Disponible sur: http://peer.asee.org/22585
Graham KL, Cohen A, Reynolds EE, Huang GC. Effect of a Flipped Classroom on Knowledge Acquisition and Retention in an Internal Medicine Residency Program. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(1):92‑7.
Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38.
Nichat A, Gajbe U, Bankar NJ, Singh BR, Badge AK. Flipped classrooms in medical education: improving learning outcomes and engaging students in critical thinking skills. Cureus. 2023 Nov 3;15(11):e48199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48199. PMID: 38054140; PMCID: PMC10694389.
Hurtubise L, Hall E, Sheridan L, Han H. The Flipped Classroom in Medical Education: Engaging Students to Build Competency. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2015;2:JMECD.S23895.
Shelby SJ, Fralish ZD. Using Edpuzzle to improve student experience and performance in the biochemistry laboratory. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021;49(4):529‑34.
Zain-Alabdeen EH. Evaluation and Perception of an Edpuzzle Class Compared with a Traditional Class among Oral Radiology Undergraduate Students. Eur J Gen Dent. 2023;12(02):115‑20.
Messina DM, Mikhail SS, Messina MJ, Novopoltseva IA. Assessment of learning outcomes of first year dental students using an interactive Nearpod educational platform. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(7):893‑9.
Buttrey K. Inclusion, engagement, and Nearpod: providing a digital alternative to traditional instruction. Ky Teach Educ J [Internet]. 2021;8(1):Article 2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.61611/2995-5904.1031
Yarhere IE, Obuzor IO, Fomsi E. Online Learning Using Google Classroom: Undergraduate Medical Students and Paediatric Residents Perspectives in the University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Int J Trop Dis Health. 8 déc 2020;8‑15.
Perception of Undergraduate Medical and Dental Students Towards Learning Anatomy in Google Classroom. Indian J Public Health Res Dev [Internet]. 23 oct 2020 [cité 7 nov 2024]; Disponible sur: http://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijphrd/article/view/11100
Dash S. Google classroom as a learning management system to teach biochemistry in a medical school. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019;47(4):404‑7.
Rahmania F, Khairana C, Zulmi Y, Krisnawati I, Adriantoni A. Educators and Students. Educ Achiev J Sci Res. 2024;616‑20.
Guo Y, Lee D. Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills. J Chem Educ. 2023;100(12):4876‑83.
Oudat Q, Othman M. Embracing digital learning: Benefits and challenges of using Canvas in education. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2024;14(10):39.
Mangaroska K, Vesin B, Giannakos M. Cross-platform analytics: a step towards personalization and adaptation in education. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 71-75. doi: 10.1145/3303772.3303825.
Kelly K, Lock E. That synching feeling: an exploration of student engagement in an online environment. Stud Success. 2021;12(3):48-57. doi: 10.5204/ssj.1771.
Mirmoghtadaie Z, Mohammadimehr M. Student support system in virtual learning environment for medical education: McKenna content analysis method. Preprint [Internet]. Research Square; 2020 Aug 20 [cited 2025 Feb 11]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-55477/v1
Siegel-Stechler K. “Conversation is everything”: How teachers and students create environments where open discussion can thrive. Theory Res Soc Educ. 2023;51(4):626‑60.
Jiang P. Unleashing the potential of ChatGPT: empowering enhanced active learning in the classroom compared to conventional passive learning. In: Abstracts of the 5th World Conference on Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and Education [Internet]. Eurasia Conferences; 2024. p. 32-32. [cited 2025 Jan 31]. Available from: https://eurasiaconferences.com/proceedings/abstracts-of-the-5th-world-conference-on-arts-humanities-social-sciences-and-education/abstracts/286
Yogeswaran V, El Morr C. Effectiveness of online mindfulness interventions on medical students’ mental health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):2293.
Wasson LT, Cusmano A, Meli L, Louh I, Falzon L, Hampsey M, et al. Association Between Learning Environment Interventions and Medical Student Well-being: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2016;316(21):2237.
Frajerman A. Quelles interventions pour améliorer le bien-être des étudiants en médecine ? Une revue de la littérature. L’Encéphale. 2020;46(1):55‑64.
Flint A. Book Review of An active student participation companion. Int J Stud Partn. 2020;4(1):162‑3.
Abbas H. Transforming education: the role of Artificial Intelligence. Stud Eng EXACT Sci. 2024;5(3):e12579.
Jiang P. Unleashing the potential of ChatGPT: empowering enhanced active learning in the classroom compared to conventional passive learning. In: Abstracts of the 5th World Conference on Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and Education [Internet]. Eurasia Conferences; 2024. p. 32-32. [cited 2025 Jan 31]. Available from: https://eurasiaconferences.com/proceedings/abstracts-of-the-5th-world-conference-on-arts-humanities-social-sciences-and-education/abstracts/286
Al Shloul T, Mazhar T, Abbas Q, Iqbal M, Ghadi YY, Shahzad T, et al. Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students’ performance in education. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2024;6:100219.
Ngo TTA. The Perception by University Students of the Use of ChatGPT in Education. Int J Emerg Technol Learn IJET. 2023;18(17):4‑19.
Ali D, Fatemi Y, Boskabadi E, Nikfar M, Ugwuoke J, Ali H. ChatGPT in Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Review. Educ Sci. 2024;14(6):643.
Tuma F, Aljazeeri J. Asynchronous group learning in learn from the learner approach: a learning object that enhances and facilitates distance self and shared learning. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul 2;67:102535. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102535. PMID: 34295464; PMCID: PMC8282459.
Li EY, Tsai SDC, Macnow A. Clinical Learning in a Time of COVID-19: Perspectives from Clerkship Students. MedEdPublish [Internet]. 2021 [cité 31 janv 2025];10(1). Disponible sur: https://mededpublish.org/articles/10-68
Rabee R, Najim M, Sherwani Y, Ahmed M, Ashraf M, Al-Jibury O, et al. YouTube in medical education: a student’s perspective. Med Educ Online. 2015;20(1):29507.
Clifton A, Mann C. Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(4):311‑3.
Prober CG, Khan S. Medical Education Reimagined: A Call to Action. Acad Med. oct 2013;88(10):1407‑10.
Dey AK. Narrowing the digital divide: building a sense of community using online tools in a post-pandemic world. Int J Innov Online Educ [Internet]. 2021;5(3). [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://onlineinnovationsjournal.com/streams/scholarship-of-online-teaching-and-learning/7c8f570c3c1a4bfd.html96. Khalil H, Ebner M. Using Electronic Communication Tools in Online Group Activities to Develop Collaborative Learning Skills. Univers J Educ Res. 2017;5(4):529‑36.
Anderi E, Sherman L, Saymuah S, Ayers E, Kromrei HT. Learning communities engage medical students: a COVID-19 virtual conversation series. Cureus. 2020 Aug 6;12(8):e9593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9593. PMID: 32923199; PMCID: PMC7478637.
Fenech M, Mead N, Fenech N. ‘Virtual café’ sessions: supporting medical sonography students learning anatomy online. Reflective Pract. 2024;25(1):74‑86.
M.R RK. Teacher-Student Feedback Dynamics And Their Implications For Effective Teaching. Educ Adm Theory Pract. 2024;9671‑7.
Fichiers supplémentaires
Publiée
Licence
Merci de créditer les auteurs lors de toute citation : La Tunisie Médicale (2026)
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
