Evaluation de l’apprentissage par les étudiants en Médecine Dentaire: cas de la faculté de Médecine dentaire de Monastir (Tunisie)
Résumé
Introduction : Les méthodes pédagogiques utilisées en sciences médicales ne cessent d’évoluer. Pour identifier l’implication des étudiants dans leur
formation, l’évaluation des différentes méthodes pédagogiques est indispensable.
But: Evaluer l’apprentissage à la faculté de Médecine Dentaire de Monastir (FMDM) par les étudiants inscrits à cet établissement.
Méthodes : Il s’agit d’une étude descriptive et qualitative qui a été menée auprès des étudiants en 6ème année de la FMDM durant l’année universitaire
2020/2021. Les données ont été collectées grâce à un questionnaire rédigé en langue française et composé de six parties relatives à l’évaluation des
différentes méthodes pédagogiques par les étudiants. Un groupe de discussion semi-structuré (Focus Group) a été mené. Dix étudiants, n’ayant pas
répondu au questionnaire, ont participé à cet entretien de groupe.
Résultats : Sur les 240 stagiaires internes, 161 ont répondu au questionnaire. Les étudiants se considèrent comme des apprenants totalement (18,6%)
ou partiellement (66,4%) actifs. Cependant, 67,1% d’entre eux ont jugé leur formation à la FMDM en deçà de leurs attentes. L’apprentissage en milieu
clinique est la méthode pédagogique la plus appréciée par les étudiants (46,7%) suivie par l’enseignement pratique (24,8) et le cours magistral (15,5%).
Conclusion: Cette étude montre que les étudiants de la FMDM sont intéressés par leurs études. Cependant, ces derniers critiquent les méthodes
d’apprentissage utilisées.
Téléchargements
Références
Nadershahi NA, Bender DJ, Beck L, Alexander S. A case study on development of an integrated, multidisciplinary dental curriculum. J Dent Educ 2013;77(6):679-87.
Lee MK, Allareddy V, Howell TH, Karimbux NY. Association Between National Board Dental Examination Part II Scores and Comprehensive Examinations at Harvard School of Dental Medicine. J Dent Educ 2011;75(1):90-7.
Fujikura T, Takeshita T, Homma H, Adachi K, Miyake K, Kudo M, et al. Team-based learning using an audience response system: a possible new strategy for interactive medical education. J Nippon Med Sch 2013;80(1):63-9.
Lennon AM, Anderson PF, McDonald JL, Stookey GK. Problem-based learning and the dental school library. J Dent Educ 2001;65(11):1219-24.
Moreno-Lopez LA, Somacarrera-Perez ML, Diaz-Rodriguez MM, Campo-Trapero J, Cano-Sanchez J. Problem-based learning versus lectures: comparison of academic results and time devoted by teachers in a course on Dentistry in Special Patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14(11):e583-7.
Bryant JL. Assessing expectations and perception of the campus experience: the Noel-Levitz student satisfaction inventory. New Dir for Community Coll 2006;134:25-35.
Shetty VB, Shirahatti RV, Pawar P. Students’ perceptions of their education on graduation from a dental school in India. J Dent Educ 2012;76(11):1520-6.
Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. North American dental students’ perspectives about their clinical education. J Dent Educ 2006;70(4):361-77.
Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. In the students’ own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ 2007;71(5):632-45.
Gerzina TM, McLean T, Fairley J. Dental clinical teaching: perceptions of students and teachers. J Dent Educ 2005;69(12):1377-84.
Abdelkarim A, Benghuzzi H, Hamadain E, Tucci M, Ford T, Sullivan D. U.S. Dental students’ and faculty members’ attitudes about technology, instructional strategies, student diversity, and school duration: a comparative study. J Dent Educ 2014;78(4):614-21.
Jbeli R, Louhaichi S, Khlfallah I, Marzouki S, Kaabi L, Elfidha S et al. First and second wave of COVID-19 in Tunisia : A comparative study among patients hospitalized in a medicine department. Eur Respir J 2021; 58:S65,PA3816.
Kobale M, Klaic M, Bavrka G, Vodanovic M. Motivation and Career Perceptions of Dental Students at the School of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb, Croatia. Acta Stomatol Croat 2016;50(3):207-14.
Poorolajal J, Cheraghi P, Irani AD, Cheraghi Z, Mirfakhraei M. Construction of knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire for assessing plagiarism. Iran J Public Health 2012; 41(11): 54-8.
Laallemand C. Méthodes de design UX : 30 méthodes fondamentales pour concevoir des expériences optimales. Paris : Eyrolles, 2018.
Banabilh SM. Career decisions of undergraduate dental students at the University of Science and Technology, Yemen. J Dent Educ 2013;77(3):331-6.
Kassebaum DK, Hendricson WD, Taft T, Haden NK. The dental curriculum at North American dental institutions in 2002-03: a survey of current structure, recent innovations, and planned changes. J Dent Educ 2004;68(9):914-31.
Khalifian S, Markman T, Sampognaro P, Mitchell S, Weeks S, Dattilo J. Medical student appraisal: searching on smartphones. Appl Clin Inform 2013;4(1):53-60.
Junges R, Stello RS, Portella FF, Rosing CK, Samuel SM. Impact of the implantation of a new curriculum in the process of learning in a Faculty of Dentistry in Brazil. Brazi Oral Res 2011;25(6):478-84.
Kaufman DM. L’éducation centrée sur l’enseignant ou centrée sur l’apprenant : une fausse dichotomie. Pédagogie médicale. 2002:145-7.
Abdelkarim A, Benghuzzi H, Hamadain E, Tucci M, Ford T, Sullivan D. U.S. Dental students’ and faculty members’ attitudes about technology, instructional strategies, student diversity, and school duration: a comparative study. J Dent Educ 2014;78(4):614-21.
Papanna KM, Kulkarni V, Tanvi D, Lakshmi V, Kriti L, Unnikrishnan B, et al. Perceptions and preferences of medical students regarding teaching methods in a Medical College, Mangalore India. Afr Health Sci 2013;13(3):808-13.
Alcota M, Munoz A, Gonzalez FE. Diverse and participative learning methodologies: a remedial teaching intervention for low marks dental students in Chile. J Dent Educ 2011;75(10):1390-5.
Warnecke E, Pearson S. Medical students’ perceptions of using e-learning to enhance the acquisition of consulting skills. Australas Med J 2011;4(6):300-7.
Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, Jahedi F, Moattari M. Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:45.
Pahinis K, Stokes CW, Walsh TF, Tsitrou E, Cannavina G. A blended learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school: follow-up evaluation. J Dent Educ 2008;72(9):1048-57.
Sukotjo C, Thammasitboon K, Howell H, Karimbux N. The impact of targeted shortened preclinical exercises on student perceptions and outcomes. J Dent Educ 2007;71(8):1070-9.
Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. In the students’ own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ 2007;71(5):632-45.
Gerzina TM, McLean T, Fairley J. Dental clinical teaching: perceptions of students and teachers. J Dent Educ 2005;69(12):1377-84.
Shetty VB, Shirahatti RV, Pawar P. Students’ perceptions of their education on graduation from a dental school in India. J Dent Educ 2012;76(11):1520-6.
Keeve PL, Gerhards U, Arnold WA, Zimmer S, Zollner A. Job requirements compared to dental school education: impact of a case-based learning curriculum. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2012;29(4):54.
Lynch CD, Ash PJ, Chadwick BL, Hannigan A. Evaluation of a U.K community-based clinical teaching/outreach program by former dental students two and five years after graduation. J Dent Educ 2010;74(10):1146-52.
Hung M, Licari FW, Hon ES, Lauren E, Su S, Birmingham WC el al. In an era of uncertainty: Impact of COVID-19 on dental education . J Dent Educ 2021;85(2):148-56.
