Colorectal neoplasia in elderly versus young patients in tunisia: analysis of colonoscopic findings

Authors

  • Asma Ouakaa-Kchaou Service de Gastro-entérologie Hôpital H. Thameur Tunis
  • Hela Elloumi
  • Afef Ouaz
  • Dalila Gargouri Service de Gastro-entérologie Hôpital H. Thameur Tunis
  • Rania Hefaiedh
  • Asma Kochlef
  • Afef Kilani
  • Malika Romani
  • Jamel Kharrat
  • Abdeljabbar Ghorbel

Keywords:

Colorectal neoplasm, colonoscopy, elderly

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer occurs more frequently in older patients. Since the older population is increasing, a better understanding of the characteristics of colorectal neoplasm according to the age would be useful.
Aim: To determine the differences of clinical characteristics of colorectal neoplasm including polyps between the elderly and young patients.
Methods: Colonoscopy database from 2004 to 2008 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 1510 eligible patients who underwent colonoscopy with a mean age of 54 years. Patients were classified into two groups: the older age group (Group 1, aged ³ 60 years, n = 626) and the younger age group (Group 2, aged < 60 years, n = 884). Data were recorded on age, gender, colonoscopic indications, colonoscopic findings, and their related histological findings and tumor location.
Results: The risk of finding polyps and cancer at colonoscopy increases with age (29.4% in the older age group and 11% in the younger age group (p < 0.05). Left-sided lesions were noted to be more frequent in both age groups (66% and 67% respectively).
Conclusion: The chance of detecting colorectal neoplasm by colonoscopy was higher in the elderly. However, both groups had the lesions predominately located in the left side.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rerknimitr R, Ratanapanish W, Kongkam P, Kullavanijaya P. Differences in characteristics of colorectal neoplasm between young and elderly Thaïs. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:7684-9.

McCashland TM, Brand R, Lyden E, De Garmo P. Gender differences in colorectal polyps and tumors. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:882-9.

Arora A, Singh P. Colonoscopy in patients 80 years of age and older is safe, with high success rate and diagnostic yield. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:408-13.

Nelson RL, Dollear T, Freels S, Persky V. The relation of age, race and gender to subsite location of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80:193-7.

Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Haug U. Gender differences in colorectal cancer: implications for age at initiation screening. British J Cancer 2007; 96:828-31.

Okamoto M, Shiratori Y, Yamaji Y et al. Relationship between age and site of colorectal cancer based on colonoscopy findings. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:548-51.

Slater G, Papatestas AE, Tartter PI, Mulvihill M, Aufses AH. Age distribution of right and left-sided colorectal cancers. Am J Gastroenterol 1982; 77:63-6.

Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M et al. The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:255-62.

Nawa T, Kato J, Kawamoto H, et al. Difference between right and left-sided colon cancer in patient characteristics, cancer morphology and histology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23:418- 23.

Wu X, Chen WV, Martin J, et al. Subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage distribution among Asians and pacific islanders in the United States, 1995 to 1999. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13:1215-22.

Wu XC, Chen WV, Steele B et al. Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender and age group in the United States, 1992 - 1997. Cancer 2001; 92:2547- 54.

Wu XC, Cokkinides V, Chen WV et al. Associations of subsitespecific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage of disease at diagnosis with country-level poverty, by race and sex. Cancer 2006;107: 1121-7.

Rex DK, Chak A, Vasudeva R et al. Prospective determination of distal colon findings in average-risk patients with proximal colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:727-30.

Downloads

Published

2011-03-04

Issue

Section

Original articles