Prevention of perioperative anxiety: Interest of audiovisual distraction

Authors

  • Faten Haddad Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunis. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Sirine Rais Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunis. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Hajer Arfaoui Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunis. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Emna Kammoun Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunis. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Skander Naimi Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunis. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
  • M’hamed Sami Mebazaa Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunis. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.4468

Keywords:

Technology , Perioperative Period , Anxiety , Anesthesia, Spinal

Abstract

Introduction : Audiovisual distraction (AVD) is one of the non-pharmacological means of anxiety prevention. However, few studies have evaluated its perioperative effect in adults.

Aim : To evaluate the contribution of audio-visual distraction in the prevention of perioperative anxiety in adult patients proposed for surgery under spinal anesthesia.

Methods : This was a prospective randomized controlled study lasting three months from July 1, 2021. We included ASA I to III over 18 years patients, proposed for visceral or orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. We didn’t include patients operated in lateral or prone positions or with a history of anxiety disorders or communication difficulties. 90 patients were randomized into two groups: a control group T and a group A who had an AVD throughout the operation. The primary outcome was anxiety as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). 

Results: Demographic characteristics, Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) and pain levels were comparable between the two groups. During the surgery, 22 (48.9 %) patients in group T versus 3 (6.7 %) in group A required Midazolam (p < 0.001). Anxiety assessed by VAS at the end of the act was lower in group A (p < 0.001). The pain levels also were lower in patients who received AVD (p = 0.004). A patient satisfaction score (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale French version) ≥ 5.4 was more frequently observed in group A (p < 0.001).  

Conclusion : AVD reduced perioperative anxiety and decreased  ...(abstract truncated at 250 words).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shoar S, Naderan M, Aghajani M, Sahimi-Izadian E, Hosseini-Araghi N, Khorgami Z. Prevalence and Determinants of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Surgical Patients. Oman Med J. 2016;31:176–81.

Mıngır T, Ervatan Z, Turgut N. Spinal Anaesthesia and Perioperative Anxiety. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014;42:190–5.

Xiaolian J, Xiaolin L, Lan ZH. Effects of visual and audiovisual distraction on pain and anxiety among patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs Off J Soc Gastroenterol Nurses Assoc. 2015;38:55–61.

Maurice-Szamburski A, Auquier P, Viarre-Oreal V, Cuvillon P, Carles M, Ripart J, et al. Effect of sedative premedication on patient experience after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:916–25.

Al-Khotani A, Bello LA, Christidis N. Effects of audiovisual distraction on children’s behaviour during dental treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74:494–501.

Wattier J-M, Barreau O, Devos P, Prevost S, Vallet B, Lebuffe G. Mesure de l’anxiété et du besoin d’informations préopératoire en six questions. Ann Fr Anesth Réanimation. 2011;30:533–7.

Pan PH, Tonidandel AM, Aschenbrenner CA, Houle TT, Harris LC, Eisenach JC. Predicting acute pain after cesarean delivery using three simple questions. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1170–9.

Martin C, Auboyer C, Boisson M, Dupont H, Gauzit R, Kitzis M, et al. Antibioprophylaxis in surgery and interventional medicine (adult patients). Update 2017. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38:549–62.

Weibel S, Rücker G, Eberhart LH, Pace NL, Hartl HM, Jordan OL, et al. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10:CD012859.

Batta B, Fuchs-Buder T, Tréchot F, Angioi K. Simplified topical anesthesia protocol for ambulatory cataract surgery: safety and patient and surgeon satisfaction. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014;37:548–56.

Khiari H. Arrivée du patient debout au bloc opératoire versus arrivée sur brancard : étude comparative randomisée [Thèse]. Médecine : Tunis ; 2021. 38p

Man AKY, Yap JCM, Kwan SY, Suen KL, Yip HS, Chen PP. The effect of intra-operative video on patient anxiety: Forum. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:64–8.

Meier AW, Buys MJ, Gill M, Piacenza EW, Nguyen L, Allen CM, et al. The effect of audiovisual distraction on patient-controlled sedation under spinal anesthesia: a prospective, randomized trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35:355–61.

Huang MY, Scharf S, Chan PY. Effects of immersive virtual reality therapy on intravenous patient-controlled sedation during orthopaedic surgery under regional anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0229320.

Mitchell M. Conscious surgery: influence of the environment on patient anxiety. J Adv Nurs. 2008;64:261–71.

Marsdin E, Noble JG, Reynard JM, Turney BW. Audiovisual Distraction Reduces Pain Perception During Shockwave Lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2012;26:531–4.

Gupta A, Scott K, Dukewich M. Innovative Technology Using Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Pain: Does It Reduce Pain via Distraction, or Is There More to It? Pain Med Malden Mass. 2018;19:151–9.

Valet M, Sprenger T, Boecker H, Willoch F, Rummeny E, Conrad B, et al. Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain--an fMRI analysis. Pain. 2004;109:399–408.

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-08